Mike Gesicki plays TE for CIN, with a market value of 317 and 5.4 fantasy points per game across 13 active games.
TE CIN · Age 30 · NFL year 9
Market value
317 -124 / 30d
TE47 on the current board
Points per game
5.4
70.7 points · 13 active games
Last 4 active
6.2 +0.8 PPG
Versus 5.4 season pace
Market edge
+13 Priced behind
TE34 production vs TE47 market
Market value · 90-day signal
Current value 317. The final 30-day move is -124.
The final 30 days use the verified market delta. Earlier points provide directional context and are not recorded daily history.
Market position
Tier expectation
+2.4 PPG vs Fringe baseline
Trade frequency
0.1% of tracked trades, 30 days
30-day move
-124 (-28.1%)
Board position
TE47 market · TE34 production
The Dynalyze take
The read
HOLD. Mike Gesicki's recent production shows modest improvement with a slight uptick in points per game over the last four contests, indicating a stable but unspectacular role in Cincinnati's offense. His total scoring and market value reflect a middle-tier tight end profile that lacks a clear breakout signal at this time.
Buy 2 · Hold 0 · Fade 1
Moderate agreement: 2 of 3 reads lean buy.
Recurring themes
TE47 market rank versus TE34 production rank BUY 2 of 3 reads
Last-four pace is +0.8 PPG versus season pace BUY 2 of 3 reads
Market value moved -124 over 30 days FADE 1 of 3 reads
The case
Bull case
70.7 points across 13 active games. box scores
5.4 PPG is +2.4 versus the current tier baseline. model
TE34 production keeps the profile competitive at the position. model
Bear case
Last-four pace is +0.8 PPG versus the season rate. box scores
TE47 market rank versus TE34 production rank defines the price risk. market feed
The primary risk with Gesicki lies in his limited upside and low trade activity, which may cap his dynasty value and make him difficult to move for significant return. The lack of detailed role risk information leaves some uncertainty about potential changes in usage that could impact his production. Managers should be cautious about overvaluing incremental improvements without clearer evidence of a sustained role increase. consensus
Roster fit
Contenders should hold unless an offer clearly improves the weekly lineup. model
Rebuilders should require liquidity, picks, or age insulation before moving below tier. model
Offer discipline matters more than forcing action at the current signal strength. consensus