J.J. McCarthy plays QB for MIN, with a market value of 1,726 and 13.7 fantasy points per game across 10 active games.
QB MIN · Age 23 · NFL year 3
Market value
1,726 +56 / 30d
QB30 on the current board
Points per game
13.7
137.4 points · 10 active games
Last 4 active
15.6 +1.9 PPG
Versus 13.7 season pace
Market edge
+2 Priced behind
QB28 production vs QB30 market
Market value · 90-day signal
Current value 1,726. The final 30-day move is +56.
The final 30 days use the verified market delta. Earlier points provide directional context and are not recorded daily history.
Market position
Tier expectation
-3.3 PPG vs Flex baseline
Trade frequency
0.4% of tracked trades, 30 days
30-day move
+56 (+3.4%)
Board position
QB30 market · QB28 production
The Dynalyze take
The read
HOLD. J.J. McCarthy has produced 13.7 PPG across 10 active games, with a 15.6 PPG pace over the last four. The QB30 market price sits against QB28 production, while value moved +56 over 30 days.
Buy 3 · Hold 0 · Fade 0
Strong agreement: 3 of 3 reads lean buy.
Recurring themes
QB30 market rank versus QB28 production rank BUY 3 of 3 reads
Last-four pace is +1.9 PPG versus season pace BUY 3 of 3 reads
Market value moved +56 over 30 days BUY 3 of 3 reads
The case
Bull case
137.4 points across 10 active games. box scores
13.7 PPG is -3.3 versus the current tier baseline. model
QB28 production keeps the profile competitive at the position. model
Bear case
Last-four pace is +1.9 PPG versus the season rate. box scores
QB30 market rank versus QB28 production rank defines the price risk. market feed
The primary risk surrounding McCarthy lies in his declining market value and minimal trade activity, which may reflect doubts about his long-term fantasy ceiling or role security. Without clear insights into his team situation or usage patterns, there is an inherent uncertainty that could impact his future production. Managers should be mindful that his current valuation might not fully capture potential volatility in his performance or opportunity. consensus
Roster fit
Contenders should hold unless an offer clearly improves the weekly lineup. model
Rebuilders should require liquidity, picks, or age insulation before moving below tier. model
Offer discipline matters more than forcing action at the current signal strength. consensus